Review



rabbit anti mesothelin  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems rabbit anti mesothelin
    Rabbit Anti Mesothelin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti mesothelin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 14 article reviews
    rabbit anti mesothelin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec recombinant msln antibody
    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited <t>anti-MSLN</t> activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.
    Recombinant Msln Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant msln antibody/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant msln antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Sino Biological recombinant human msln
    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited <t>anti-MSLN</t> activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.
    Recombinant Human Msln, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human msln/product/Sino Biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human msln - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Novoprotein human mesothelin antigen
    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited <t>anti-MSLN</t> activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.
    Human Mesothelin Antigen, supplied by Novoprotein, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human mesothelin antigen/product/Novoprotein
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human mesothelin antigen - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems rabbit anti mesothelin
    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited <t>anti-MSLN</t> activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.
    Rabbit Anti Mesothelin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti mesothelin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti mesothelin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems human mesothelin
    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited <t>anti-MSLN</t> activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.
    Human Mesothelin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human mesothelin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human mesothelin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems human mesothelin elisa kit
    Proteomics Workflow in EPIC and MoMar Cohorts. Left (EPIC): SWATH LC-MS/MS profiled 323 plasma proteins from 21 asbestos-exposed cases (PM within 5 years) and 21 matched controls. A GLM identified 12 DEPs ( p ≤ 0.05, fold change ≥ 1.3 ≤ 0.75); four were <t>ELISA-validated.</t> Calretinin and <t>mesothelin</t> benchmark ELISA assays were performed. Combined markers underwent ROC analysis Right (MoMar): Three DEPs from EPIC were quantified by ELISA alongside calretinin and mesothelin. ROC analysis of the combined protein panel assessed reproducibility and predictive accuracy in the pre-diagnosis cohort
    Human Mesothelin Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human mesothelin elisa kit/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human mesothelin elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems cells human mesothelin alexa fluor 488 conjugated antibody
    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) target binding analysis following irreversible electroporation. (A) Viable and intact cells following electroporation are still available for cell membrane <t>mesothelin</t> (MSLN) binding, while necrotic cells experience a decrease in binding. (B) Flow cytometry gating to isolate single cells and plots of calcein AM versus mesothelin at 3 h following IRE delivery using 0 V/cm (control), 1,000 V/cm, and 2,000 V/cm. (C) Control using mesothelin-negative Jurkats. (D) Mesothelin expression in AsPC-1 cells compared to that in Jurkats. (E) Cell viability 3 h after electroporation at different electric field strengths; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s posttest and correction; mean ± SD; n = 4. (F) Percent mesothelin (Mes) expression of high-viability and low-viability cell populations 3 h after electroporation; multiple 2-tailed t test; mean ± SD; n = 4. (G) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging at 3 h and 7 d after treatment; the scale bar is 1 mm. (H) Viable cell count at different electric fields after IRE and following recovery; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. (I) Mesothelin binding for recovered cells at day 7; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. ns, not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. IL-2, interleukin-2; IL-15, interleukin-15; IFNγ, interferon-γ; FSC-H, forward scatter height; FSC-A, forward scatter area.
    Cells Human Mesothelin Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugated Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cells human mesothelin alexa fluor 488 conjugated antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cells human mesothelin alexa fluor 488 conjugated antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems recombinant hmsln
    Selection of Affitins specific for human mesothelin (A) Schematic representation of the sequential technical steps that led to the selection of antihuman mesothelin <t>(hMSLN)</t> Affitins. (B) Logo representation of Affitin sequences obtained by NGS. The size of each amino acid letter is proportional to its prevalence at a given position. (C) Heatmap representation of the entire dataset. Each line represents a unique sequence (redundant sequences were removed), and each column corresponds to an amino acid position. Colors represent the distance between an amino acid and the consensus sequence according to the Grantham matrix (see ). White lines delimit sequences from different selection rounds (see ). (D) Sequences were clustered into 82 clusters, and a consensus sequence was computed for each cluster. Hierarchical clustering was then applied to represent the clusters on a dendrogram. 25 sequences (yellow dots), representing the global variability, were arbitrarily chosen for further characterization.
    Recombinant Hmsln, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant hmsln/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant hmsln - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human mesothelin duoset elisa
    A) Schematic of dual-targeting Meso-FAP CAR TEAM T cells engineered to co-target PDAC tumor cells, through a <t>mesothelin-targeting</t> CAR, and tumor-associated CAFs, through a secreted FAP-targeting TEAM molecule. The secreted FAP TEAM molecule can redirect the cytotoxicity of both meso-CAR-T cells as well as CAR-negative bystander T cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment 8 . Created in BioRender.com . Escobar, Giulia. https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/66eeece9f2d42f9534e90be7?slideId=be6d217b-9bf9–4f4e-8420-dc13e4db9d9bB ). Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are implanted with subcutaneous AsPC-1 tumors cells and then adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (3e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous injection at 14 days post tumor challenge. C) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated as shown in B (n=6 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 74%). D) Survival curve of mice treated as shown in B. Mantel-Cox test. E) Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are injected intraperitoneally with AsPC-1 tumor cells and allowed to form peritoneal tumors. 7 days post tumor challenge, mice were adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (2e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous or intraperitoneal injections. F) Tumor growth kinetic (flux, photons/s, mean ± SEM) as measured by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) in mice treated as shown in E (n=6–7 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 91%). G) Tumor burden in each individual mouse from F as measured by BLI. H) Absolute numbers (mean ± SEM) of meso-CAR-T cells in the blood of AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice from F, treated as indicated and as shown in E. Two-way ANOVA. I) Proportion of CD4 and CD8 T cells within CAR-T cells in the blood of mice in F, at day15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. J) Phenotype of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice from F, at day 15 following CAR-T cell adoptive transfer by intraperitoneal or intravenous injection. T stem cell memory cells (TSCM, CD45RA+CCR7+CD95+), central memory (CM, CD45RA-CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RA-CCR7-) and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA, CD45RA+CCR7-) T cells. Unpaired Student’s t test. K) Expression of PD-1, TIM3 and CD39 markers (frequency, mean ± SEM) on the surface of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the blood of mice from F, at day 15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
    Human Mesothelin Duoset Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human mesothelin duoset elisa/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human mesothelin duoset elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited anti-MSLN activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Specificity of generated cell lines (n = 29) evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. 21 of the 29 lines exhibited anti-MSLN activity (defined as detection of >50 SFC/2×10 5 input cells). (B) Mean (± SEM) fold expansion of MSLN-specific T cells in the responder cohort (n=21). (C) Phenotype, memory/activation profile and exhaustion markers of MSLN-specific T cells in responders, reported as % expression (mean±SEM, n=8-21). MSLN, mesothelin; ELISpot, enzyme-linked immunospot; IFNγ, interferon gamma; SFC, spot-forming cells.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Generated, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Expressing

    (A) Representative donor data (left panel) and summary results (mean±SEM, n=21; right panel) showing CD8⁺/IFNγ⁺ and CD4⁺/IFNγ⁺ T cells, as assessed by ICS. (B) Representative donor data (left panel) and summary results (mean±SEM; n=21; right panel) showing dual (IFNγ/TNFα)-producing CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ MSLN-specific T cells, as assessed by ICS. (C) Polyfunctionality of MSLN-specific T cells as measured by FluoroSpot (IFNγ/Granzyme B/TNFα) (n=6). Top panel shows the total frequency (SFC/2×10 5 cells) of specific T cells for each of the individual effector molecules, while the bottom panel shows the proportion of cells that are single, dual or triple analyte-producing. TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; ICS, intracellular cytokine staining; GrB, Granzyme B.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative donor data (left panel) and summary results (mean±SEM, n=21; right panel) showing CD8⁺/IFNγ⁺ and CD4⁺/IFNγ⁺ T cells, as assessed by ICS. (B) Representative donor data (left panel) and summary results (mean±SEM; n=21; right panel) showing dual (IFNγ/TNFα)-producing CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ MSLN-specific T cells, as assessed by ICS. (C) Polyfunctionality of MSLN-specific T cells as measured by FluoroSpot (IFNγ/Granzyme B/TNFα) (n=6). Top panel shows the total frequency (SFC/2×10 5 cells) of specific T cells for each of the individual effector molecules, while the bottom panel shows the proportion of cells that are single, dual or triple analyte-producing. TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; ICS, intracellular cytokine staining; GrB, Granzyme B.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Staining

    (A) Representative donor data showing lysis of MSLN-loaded autologous PHA blasts in the absence or presence of MHC class I or class II blocking antibodies (triplicates, mean ± SD). (B) Summary cytotoxicity data (n = 17). (C) Killing of cell lines endogenously expressing MSLN by partially HLA-matched MSLN-specific T cells from three independent donors (triplicates, mean ± SD). Cytotoxicity in all panels was assessed by ⁵¹Cr release assay following a 5–8 h co-culture at a 40:1 effector-to-target (E:T) ratio. PHA, phytohemagglutinin; MHC, major histocompatibility complex.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative donor data showing lysis of MSLN-loaded autologous PHA blasts in the absence or presence of MHC class I or class II blocking antibodies (triplicates, mean ± SD). (B) Summary cytotoxicity data (n = 17). (C) Killing of cell lines endogenously expressing MSLN by partially HLA-matched MSLN-specific T cells from three independent donors (triplicates, mean ± SD). Cytotoxicity in all panels was assessed by ⁵¹Cr release assay following a 5–8 h co-culture at a 40:1 effector-to-target (E:T) ratio. PHA, phytohemagglutinin; MHC, major histocompatibility complex.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Lysis, Blocking Assay, Expressing, Release Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Immunopeptidomics

    (A) Illustration of the experimental procedure for the 3D co-culture assay using GFP/FFluc+ tumor spheroids and effector T cells. (B-C) Tumor spheroid bioluminescence in the absence of T cells (Tumor), and in the presence of MSLN or Control T cells at the indicated E:T ratios. Tumor spheroids were derived from the CFPAC-1 (B) and MS751 (C) cell lines.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Illustration of the experimental procedure for the 3D co-culture assay using GFP/FFluc+ tumor spheroids and effector T cells. (B-C) Tumor spheroid bioluminescence in the absence of T cells (Tumor), and in the presence of MSLN or Control T cells at the indicated E:T ratios. Tumor spheroids were derived from the CFPAC-1 (B) and MS751 (C) cell lines.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Co-culture Assay, Control, Derivative Assay

    (A) To identify immunogenic peptide epitopes T cell lines were screened against individual MSLN minipools by IFNγ ELISpot. Panel A shows results for donor 15 (results reported as SFC/2×10 5 ), with the potential stimulatory peptides shown in panel B. (C) To identify the immunogenic epitopes the MSLN T cell line was exposed to each of the peptides identified in panel B – screening was performed by ICS for IFNγ and results reported as % of CD3+/IFNγ+ cells. (D) Summary of identified immunogenic MSLN peptides across all 21 cell lines and color coded to identify the number of responders, with immunodominant peptides (found to elicit responses in ≥3 donors) shown in panel E.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) To identify immunogenic peptide epitopes T cell lines were screened against individual MSLN minipools by IFNγ ELISpot. Panel A shows results for donor 15 (results reported as SFC/2×10 5 ), with the potential stimulatory peptides shown in panel B. (C) To identify the immunogenic epitopes the MSLN T cell line was exposed to each of the peptides identified in panel B – screening was performed by ICS for IFNγ and results reported as % of CD3+/IFNγ+ cells. (D) Summary of identified immunogenic MSLN peptides across all 21 cell lines and color coded to identify the number of responders, with immunodominant peptides (found to elicit responses in ≥3 donors) shown in panel E.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunospot

    Identification of HLA-restricting alleles for the immunodominant MSLN peptides. (A) For peptide 30: ICS (IFNγ production) analysis to determine whether reactive T cells were detected in the CD4+ or CD8+ T cell compartment (left panel). ⁵¹Cr release assay (5-8 hr co-culture) using peptide-pulsed autologous and partially HLA-matched PHA blasts as targets (right panel). Results show % specific lysis (mean±SD), E:T 40:1. Panels B-D show similar data for peptides 145, 91, and 128/129, respectively. HLA, Human Leukocyte Antigen.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Targeting Mesothelin via the native T cell receptor

    doi: 10.64898/2025.12.02.689353

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of HLA-restricting alleles for the immunodominant MSLN peptides. (A) For peptide 30: ICS (IFNγ production) analysis to determine whether reactive T cells were detected in the CD4+ or CD8+ T cell compartment (left panel). ⁵¹Cr release assay (5-8 hr co-culture) using peptide-pulsed autologous and partially HLA-matched PHA blasts as targets (right panel). Results show % specific lysis (mean±SD), E:T 40:1. Panels B-D show similar data for peptides 145, 91, and 128/129, respectively. HLA, Human Leukocyte Antigen.

    Article Snippet: To detect MSLN expression in cancer cell lines, 2 × 105 cells were washed twice and stained with 2 μl of a monoclonal, anti-human, recombinant MSLN antibody (RRID:AB_2733680) (Miltenyi Biotec), diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Release Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Lysis

    Proteomics Workflow in EPIC and MoMar Cohorts. Left (EPIC): SWATH LC-MS/MS profiled 323 plasma proteins from 21 asbestos-exposed cases (PM within 5 years) and 21 matched controls. A GLM identified 12 DEPs ( p ≤ 0.05, fold change ≥ 1.3 ≤ 0.75); four were ELISA-validated. Calretinin and mesothelin benchmark ELISA assays were performed. Combined markers underwent ROC analysis Right (MoMar): Three DEPs from EPIC were quantified by ELISA alongside calretinin and mesothelin. ROC analysis of the combined protein panel assessed reproducibility and predictive accuracy in the pre-diagnosis cohort

    Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: A proteomics approach to identify predictive blood biomarkers for pleural mesothelioma in prospective cohorts

    doi: 10.1007/s10238-026-02058-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Proteomics Workflow in EPIC and MoMar Cohorts. Left (EPIC): SWATH LC-MS/MS profiled 323 plasma proteins from 21 asbestos-exposed cases (PM within 5 years) and 21 matched controls. A GLM identified 12 DEPs ( p ≤ 0.05, fold change ≥ 1.3 ≤ 0.75); four were ELISA-validated. Calretinin and mesothelin benchmark ELISA assays were performed. Combined markers underwent ROC analysis Right (MoMar): Three DEPs from EPIC were quantified by ELISA alongside calretinin and mesothelin. ROC analysis of the combined protein panel assessed reproducibility and predictive accuracy in the pre-diagnosis cohort

    Article Snippet: The measurements of serum calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA assays in the EPIC samples using the Calretinin ELISA kit (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) and Human Mesothelin ELISA kit (R&D systems Inc.) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Data-independent acquisition, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Clinical Proteomics, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Biomarker Discovery

    ELISA validation of candidate DEPs in pre-diagnostic EPIC sera. Box plots display serum concentrations of B2M (ng/mL), C4 (µg/mL), TF (µg/mL), and DCD (µg/mL) in cases sampled 0–2 years and 2–5 years before PM diagnosis versus matched controls. B2M showed a borderline significant increase in the 0–2 year group (t-test and GLM p < 0.05); TF, C4, and DCD trended similarly but were not significant. Asterisks indicate nominal p < 0.05

    Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: A proteomics approach to identify predictive blood biomarkers for pleural mesothelioma in prospective cohorts

    doi: 10.1007/s10238-026-02058-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ELISA validation of candidate DEPs in pre-diagnostic EPIC sera. Box plots display serum concentrations of B2M (ng/mL), C4 (µg/mL), TF (µg/mL), and DCD (µg/mL) in cases sampled 0–2 years and 2–5 years before PM diagnosis versus matched controls. B2M showed a borderline significant increase in the 0–2 year group (t-test and GLM p < 0.05); TF, C4, and DCD trended similarly but were not significant. Asterisks indicate nominal p < 0.05

    Article Snippet: The measurements of serum calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA assays in the EPIC samples using the Calretinin ELISA kit (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) and Human Mesothelin ELISA kit (R&D systems Inc.) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Diagnostic Assay

    ELISA replication of candidate DEPs in MoMar plasma. Box plots show concentrations of B2M (ng/mL), TF (µg/mL), and C4 (µg/mL) in pre-diagnostic cases versus asbestos-exposed non-cancer controls. No significant differences were observed for any marker

    Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: A proteomics approach to identify predictive blood biomarkers for pleural mesothelioma in prospective cohorts

    doi: 10.1007/s10238-026-02058-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ELISA replication of candidate DEPs in MoMar plasma. Box plots show concentrations of B2M (ng/mL), TF (µg/mL), and C4 (µg/mL) in pre-diagnostic cases versus asbestos-exposed non-cancer controls. No significant differences were observed for any marker

    Article Snippet: The measurements of serum calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA assays in the EPIC samples using the Calretinin ELISA kit (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) and Human Mesothelin ELISA kit (R&D systems Inc.) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Diagnostic Assay, Marker

    ELISA quantification of calretinin and mesothelin in pre-diagnostic EPIC and MoMar samples. ( A ) EPIC serum: calretinin (ng/mL) and mesothelin (nM) levels in cases sampled 0–2 years and 2–5 years before diagnosis versus controls. ( B ) MoMar plasma: calretinin and mesothelin levels in 0–2 years and 2–5 years pre-diagnostic cases compared to asbestos-exposed non-cancer controls. Calretinin was significantly elevated in MoMar cases at 0–2 years ( p < 0.01), whereas EPIC increases were not significant. Mesothelin levels reached significance only in MoMar ( p < 0.0001). Asterisks indicate significance (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.0001)

    Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: A proteomics approach to identify predictive blood biomarkers for pleural mesothelioma in prospective cohorts

    doi: 10.1007/s10238-026-02058-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ELISA quantification of calretinin and mesothelin in pre-diagnostic EPIC and MoMar samples. ( A ) EPIC serum: calretinin (ng/mL) and mesothelin (nM) levels in cases sampled 0–2 years and 2–5 years before diagnosis versus controls. ( B ) MoMar plasma: calretinin and mesothelin levels in 0–2 years and 2–5 years pre-diagnostic cases compared to asbestos-exposed non-cancer controls. Calretinin was significantly elevated in MoMar cases at 0–2 years ( p < 0.01), whereas EPIC increases were not significant. Mesothelin levels reached significance only in MoMar ( p < 0.0001). Asterisks indicate significance (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.0001)

    Article Snippet: The measurements of serum calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA assays in the EPIC samples using the Calretinin ELISA kit (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) and Human Mesothelin ELISA kit (R&D systems Inc.) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Diagnostic Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Clinical Proteomics

    Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of combined biomarker panels in pre-diagnostic PM cases. ( A ) EPIC cohort: ROC curves for models using B2M alone (mod1, AUC = 0.71), B2M + C4 + TF (mod2, AUC = 0.81), Mesothelin + Calretinin (mod3, AUC = 0.65), and all five markers (mod4, AUC = 0.88; p-value = 0.17 vs. mod1 by DeLong’s test). ( B ) MoMar cohort: ROC curves for the same models (mod1 AUC = 0.55), mod2 (AUC = 0.75), mod3 (AUC = 0.84), and mod4 (AUC = 0.91; p = 0.001 vs. mod1)

    Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Article Title: A proteomics approach to identify predictive blood biomarkers for pleural mesothelioma in prospective cohorts

    doi: 10.1007/s10238-026-02058-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of combined biomarker panels in pre-diagnostic PM cases. ( A ) EPIC cohort: ROC curves for models using B2M alone (mod1, AUC = 0.71), B2M + C4 + TF (mod2, AUC = 0.81), Mesothelin + Calretinin (mod3, AUC = 0.65), and all five markers (mod4, AUC = 0.88; p-value = 0.17 vs. mod1 by DeLong’s test). ( B ) MoMar cohort: ROC curves for the same models (mod1 AUC = 0.55), mod2 (AUC = 0.75), mod3 (AUC = 0.84), and mod4 (AUC = 0.91; p = 0.001 vs. mod1)

    Article Snippet: The measurements of serum calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA assays in the EPIC samples using the Calretinin ELISA kit (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) and Human Mesothelin ELISA kit (R&D systems Inc.) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Diagnostic Assay

    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) target binding analysis following irreversible electroporation. (A) Viable and intact cells following electroporation are still available for cell membrane mesothelin (MSLN) binding, while necrotic cells experience a decrease in binding. (B) Flow cytometry gating to isolate single cells and plots of calcein AM versus mesothelin at 3 h following IRE delivery using 0 V/cm (control), 1,000 V/cm, and 2,000 V/cm. (C) Control using mesothelin-negative Jurkats. (D) Mesothelin expression in AsPC-1 cells compared to that in Jurkats. (E) Cell viability 3 h after electroporation at different electric field strengths; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s posttest and correction; mean ± SD; n = 4. (F) Percent mesothelin (Mes) expression of high-viability and low-viability cell populations 3 h after electroporation; multiple 2-tailed t test; mean ± SD; n = 4. (G) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging at 3 h and 7 d after treatment; the scale bar is 1 mm. (H) Viable cell count at different electric fields after IRE and following recovery; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. (I) Mesothelin binding for recovered cells at day 7; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. ns, not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. IL-2, interleukin-2; IL-15, interleukin-15; IFNγ, interferon-γ; FSC-H, forward scatter height; FSC-A, forward scatter area.

    Journal: Research

    Article Title: Novel Combination of Irreversible Electroporation and Allogenic Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Synergizes Therapeutic Outcomes in a Preclinical Human Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model

    doi: 10.34133/research.1105

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) target binding analysis following irreversible electroporation. (A) Viable and intact cells following electroporation are still available for cell membrane mesothelin (MSLN) binding, while necrotic cells experience a decrease in binding. (B) Flow cytometry gating to isolate single cells and plots of calcein AM versus mesothelin at 3 h following IRE delivery using 0 V/cm (control), 1,000 V/cm, and 2,000 V/cm. (C) Control using mesothelin-negative Jurkats. (D) Mesothelin expression in AsPC-1 cells compared to that in Jurkats. (E) Cell viability 3 h after electroporation at different electric field strengths; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s posttest and correction; mean ± SD; n = 4. (F) Percent mesothelin (Mes) expression of high-viability and low-viability cell populations 3 h after electroporation; multiple 2-tailed t test; mean ± SD; n = 4. (G) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging at 3 h and 7 d after treatment; the scale bar is 1 mm. (H) Viable cell count at different electric fields after IRE and following recovery; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. (I) Mesothelin binding for recovered cells at day 7; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest and correction within each timepoint; mean ± SD; n = 4. ns, not significant; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. IL-2, interleukin-2; IL-15, interleukin-15; IFNγ, interferon-γ; FSC-H, forward scatter height; FSC-A, forward scatter area.

    Article Snippet: The cells were again centrifuged and resuspended with 1 μl (10 μl/10 6 cells) Human Mesothelin Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated Antibody (R&D Systems, FAB32652G) and 0.5 μl of Invitrogen CellTrace Calcein Red-Orange, AM (Fisher Scientific, 50-113-7411) in 500 μl of flow cytometry buffer.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Electroporation, Membrane, Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing, Imaging, Cell Characterization

    Selection of Affitins specific for human mesothelin (A) Schematic representation of the sequential technical steps that led to the selection of antihuman mesothelin (hMSLN) Affitins. (B) Logo representation of Affitin sequences obtained by NGS. The size of each amino acid letter is proportional to its prevalence at a given position. (C) Heatmap representation of the entire dataset. Each line represents a unique sequence (redundant sequences were removed), and each column corresponds to an amino acid position. Colors represent the distance between an amino acid and the consensus sequence according to the Grantham matrix (see ). White lines delimit sequences from different selection rounds (see ). (D) Sequences were clustered into 82 clusters, and a consensus sequence was computed for each cluster. Hierarchical clustering was then applied to represent the clusters on a dendrogram. 25 sequences (yellow dots), representing the global variability, were arbitrarily chosen for further characterization.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: Development of potent Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers for the therapy of MSLN-expressing cancers

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201095

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Selection of Affitins specific for human mesothelin (A) Schematic representation of the sequential technical steps that led to the selection of antihuman mesothelin (hMSLN) Affitins. (B) Logo representation of Affitin sequences obtained by NGS. The size of each amino acid letter is proportional to its prevalence at a given position. (C) Heatmap representation of the entire dataset. Each line represents a unique sequence (redundant sequences were removed), and each column corresponds to an amino acid position. Colors represent the distance between an amino acid and the consensus sequence according to the Grantham matrix (see ). White lines delimit sequences from different selection rounds (see ). (D) Sequences were clustered into 82 clusters, and a consensus sequence was computed for each cluster. Hierarchical clustering was then applied to represent the clusters on a dendrogram. 25 sequences (yellow dots), representing the global variability, were arbitrarily chosen for further characterization.

    Article Snippet: Maxisorp plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with either 100 μL of 2 μg/mL recombinant hMSLN (R&D Systems, 3265-MS) or 66 μM NeutrAvidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and blocked with 300 μL of PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Selection, Sequencing

    Characterization of the specificity of the most promising antihMSLN Affitins N13 and N18 Affitins were tetramerized on fluorescent streptavidin to facilitate detection. The Affitin tetramers were added to cocultures of fluorescent Meso34-hMSLN (hMSLN+) and unstained Meso34 cells (hMSLN−). Tetramers were either added to the culture medium and incubated statically for 30 min at 37°C or diluted in culture medium and applied to the cocultures under flow (10 μL/min) for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed, stained with phalloidin, and analyzed by confocal microscopy (×60 obj). Scale bars, 20 μm.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: Development of potent Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers for the therapy of MSLN-expressing cancers

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201095

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of the specificity of the most promising antihMSLN Affitins N13 and N18 Affitins were tetramerized on fluorescent streptavidin to facilitate detection. The Affitin tetramers were added to cocultures of fluorescent Meso34-hMSLN (hMSLN+) and unstained Meso34 cells (hMSLN−). Tetramers were either added to the culture medium and incubated statically for 30 min at 37°C or diluted in culture medium and applied to the cocultures under flow (10 μL/min) for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed, stained with phalloidin, and analyzed by confocal microscopy (×60 obj). Scale bars, 20 μm.

    Article Snippet: Maxisorp plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with either 100 μL of 2 μg/mL recombinant hMSLN (R&D Systems, 3265-MS) or 66 μM NeutrAvidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and blocked with 300 μL of PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Incubation, Staining, Confocal Microscopy

    Dimerization of N13 Affitin drastically improves its specific binding to cellular hMSLN (A) A homodimer of the N13 Affitin was produced, and its capacity to bind to recombinant hMSLN fragment 302–359 was assessed by surface plasmon resonance. The affinity constants obtained, calculated with the bivalent model, are displayed in the table in (B). (C–D) Meso34 (MSLN−) and Meso34-MSLN (MSLN+) cells were stained with a concentration range of N13 monomer or dimer, and N13 binding was quantified by flow cytometry ( n = 3 independent experiments). Results are displayed as the means of ratios of median fluorescence intensities (RMFI) +/− SEM, normalized to the median fluorescence intensity of the secondary antibody alone. (E) N13 dimer was diluted to 1 μM in culture medium, and a flow of this solution was applied multiple times on cocultures of fluorescent Meso34-hMSLN cancer cells (MSLN+), nonfluorescent human fibroblasts, and nonfluorescent human endothelial cells. Nuclei were stained with Draq5, endothelial cells were revealed by von Willebrand Factor (vWF) staining after fixation, and the specificity of dimer binding was assessed by confocal microscopy (×60 obj). Scale bars, 20 μm.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: Development of potent Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers for the therapy of MSLN-expressing cancers

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201095

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dimerization of N13 Affitin drastically improves its specific binding to cellular hMSLN (A) A homodimer of the N13 Affitin was produced, and its capacity to bind to recombinant hMSLN fragment 302–359 was assessed by surface plasmon resonance. The affinity constants obtained, calculated with the bivalent model, are displayed in the table in (B). (C–D) Meso34 (MSLN−) and Meso34-MSLN (MSLN+) cells were stained with a concentration range of N13 monomer or dimer, and N13 binding was quantified by flow cytometry ( n = 3 independent experiments). Results are displayed as the means of ratios of median fluorescence intensities (RMFI) +/− SEM, normalized to the median fluorescence intensity of the secondary antibody alone. (E) N13 dimer was diluted to 1 μM in culture medium, and a flow of this solution was applied multiple times on cocultures of fluorescent Meso34-hMSLN cancer cells (MSLN+), nonfluorescent human fibroblasts, and nonfluorescent human endothelial cells. Nuclei were stained with Draq5, endothelial cells were revealed by von Willebrand Factor (vWF) staining after fixation, and the specificity of dimer binding was assessed by confocal microscopy (×60 obj). Scale bars, 20 μm.

    Article Snippet: Maxisorp plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with either 100 μL of 2 μg/mL recombinant hMSLN (R&D Systems, 3265-MS) or 66 μM NeutrAvidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and blocked with 300 μL of PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Produced, Recombinant, SPR Assay, Staining, Concentration Assay, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Confocal Microscopy

    Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers efficiently induce NK-mediated cytotoxicity on Meso34-hMSLN cells (A) Bispecific NK engagers (BiKEs), composed of either a monomer (C21(N13) 1 ) or a dimer (C21(N13) 2 ) of the N13 Affitin fused to the C21 anti-CD16 nanobody, were generated, and their capacity to bind to recombinant hMSLN fragment 302–359 was assessed by surface plasmon resonance. The affinity constants obtained, calculated using the Langmuir model (for C21(N13) 1 ) or the bivalent model (for C21(N13) 2 ), are displayed in the table in (B). (C) Meso34-hMSLN cells were stained with a concentration range of C21(N13) 1 and C21(N13) 2 BiKEs to validate their capacity to bind hMSLN. Binding was quantified by flow cytometry. (D–F) A Cr-51 cytotoxicity assay was performed using the Meso34-hMSLN cell line (hMSLN+) as targets and the NK92CD16h NK cell line as effectors, in the presence of several concentrations of C21(C5) 2 irrelevant BiKE (D), C21(N13) 1 (E), and C21(N13) 2 BiKEs (F). The assay was conducted with effector/target ratios of 20:1 (circles), 10:1 (squares), and 1:1 (triangles). (C–F) Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: Development of potent Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers for the therapy of MSLN-expressing cancers

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.201095

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Affitin-based bispecific NK cell engagers efficiently induce NK-mediated cytotoxicity on Meso34-hMSLN cells (A) Bispecific NK engagers (BiKEs), composed of either a monomer (C21(N13) 1 ) or a dimer (C21(N13) 2 ) of the N13 Affitin fused to the C21 anti-CD16 nanobody, were generated, and their capacity to bind to recombinant hMSLN fragment 302–359 was assessed by surface plasmon resonance. The affinity constants obtained, calculated using the Langmuir model (for C21(N13) 1 ) or the bivalent model (for C21(N13) 2 ), are displayed in the table in (B). (C) Meso34-hMSLN cells were stained with a concentration range of C21(N13) 1 and C21(N13) 2 BiKEs to validate their capacity to bind hMSLN. Binding was quantified by flow cytometry. (D–F) A Cr-51 cytotoxicity assay was performed using the Meso34-hMSLN cell line (hMSLN+) as targets and the NK92CD16h NK cell line as effectors, in the presence of several concentrations of C21(C5) 2 irrelevant BiKE (D), C21(N13) 1 (E), and C21(N13) 2 BiKEs (F). The assay was conducted with effector/target ratios of 20:1 (circles), 10:1 (squares), and 1:1 (triangles). (C–F) Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: Maxisorp plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with either 100 μL of 2 μg/mL recombinant hMSLN (R&D Systems, 3265-MS) or 66 μM NeutrAvidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and blocked with 300 μL of PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Techniques: Generated, Recombinant, SPR Assay, Staining, Concentration Assay, Binding Assay, Flow Cytometry, Cytotoxicity Assay

    A) Schematic of dual-targeting Meso-FAP CAR TEAM T cells engineered to co-target PDAC tumor cells, through a mesothelin-targeting CAR, and tumor-associated CAFs, through a secreted FAP-targeting TEAM molecule. The secreted FAP TEAM molecule can redirect the cytotoxicity of both meso-CAR-T cells as well as CAR-negative bystander T cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment 8 . Created in BioRender.com . Escobar, Giulia. https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/66eeece9f2d42f9534e90be7?slideId=be6d217b-9bf9–4f4e-8420-dc13e4db9d9bB ). Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are implanted with subcutaneous AsPC-1 tumors cells and then adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (3e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous injection at 14 days post tumor challenge. C) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated as shown in B (n=6 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 74%). D) Survival curve of mice treated as shown in B. Mantel-Cox test. E) Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are injected intraperitoneally with AsPC-1 tumor cells and allowed to form peritoneal tumors. 7 days post tumor challenge, mice were adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (2e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous or intraperitoneal injections. F) Tumor growth kinetic (flux, photons/s, mean ± SEM) as measured by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) in mice treated as shown in E (n=6–7 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 91%). G) Tumor burden in each individual mouse from F as measured by BLI. H) Absolute numbers (mean ± SEM) of meso-CAR-T cells in the blood of AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice from F, treated as indicated and as shown in E. Two-way ANOVA. I) Proportion of CD4 and CD8 T cells within CAR-T cells in the blood of mice in F, at day15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. J) Phenotype of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice from F, at day 15 following CAR-T cell adoptive transfer by intraperitoneal or intravenous injection. T stem cell memory cells (TSCM, CD45RA+CCR7+CD95+), central memory (CM, CD45RA-CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RA-CCR7-) and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA, CD45RA+CCR7-) T cells. Unpaired Student’s t test. K) Expression of PD-1, TIM3 and CD39 markers (frequency, mean ± SEM) on the surface of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the blood of mice from F, at day 15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

    Journal: Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

    Article Title: Ibrutinib and PD-1 blockade potentiate mesothelin-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer

    doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-2907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Schematic of dual-targeting Meso-FAP CAR TEAM T cells engineered to co-target PDAC tumor cells, through a mesothelin-targeting CAR, and tumor-associated CAFs, through a secreted FAP-targeting TEAM molecule. The secreted FAP TEAM molecule can redirect the cytotoxicity of both meso-CAR-T cells as well as CAR-negative bystander T cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment 8 . Created in BioRender.com . Escobar, Giulia. https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/66eeece9f2d42f9534e90be7?slideId=be6d217b-9bf9–4f4e-8420-dc13e4db9d9bB ). Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are implanted with subcutaneous AsPC-1 tumors cells and then adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (3e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous injection at 14 days post tumor challenge. C) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated as shown in B (n=6 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 74%). D) Survival curve of mice treated as shown in B. Mantel-Cox test. E) Schematic of the experimental design. Mice are injected intraperitoneally with AsPC-1 tumor cells and allowed to form peritoneal tumors. 7 days post tumor challenge, mice were adoptively transferred with meso-CAR-T cells (2e6) or UTD T cells by intravenous or intraperitoneal injections. F) Tumor growth kinetic (flux, photons/s, mean ± SEM) as measured by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) in mice treated as shown in E (n=6–7 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD53 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 72%, viability at infusion: 91%). G) Tumor burden in each individual mouse from F as measured by BLI. H) Absolute numbers (mean ± SEM) of meso-CAR-T cells in the blood of AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice from F, treated as indicated and as shown in E. Two-way ANOVA. I) Proportion of CD4 and CD8 T cells within CAR-T cells in the blood of mice in F, at day15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. J) Phenotype of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice from F, at day 15 following CAR-T cell adoptive transfer by intraperitoneal or intravenous injection. T stem cell memory cells (TSCM, CD45RA+CCR7+CD95+), central memory (CM, CD45RA-CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RA-CCR7-) and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA, CD45RA+CCR7-) T cells. Unpaired Student’s t test. K) Expression of PD-1, TIM3 and CD39 markers (frequency, mean ± SEM) on the surface of CD4-positive and CD8-positive CAR-T cells in the blood of mice from F, at day 15 post adoptive CAR-T cell transfer by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection. Unpaired Student’s t test. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: To analyze soluble mesothelin in the culture supernatant, the Human Mesothelin DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY3265) kit was used according to manufacturer protocol.

    Techniques: Injection, Transduction, Imaging, Adoptive Transfer Assay, Expressing

    A) Representative histograms of ADAM-10 and ADAM-17 expression in the indicated pancreatic cancer cell lines as measured by flow cytometry. B) Representative flow histograms of mesothelin expression in the indicated pancreatic cancer cell lines. C-E) Representative flow histograms (C) and quantification (C-E; mean ± SEM; frequency and mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) of mesothelin expression in AsPC-1, CAPAN-2 and BxPC-3 tumor cells either left untreated (DMSO) or treated with the indicated concentrations of aderbasib for 72 hours. Mesothelin knock-out (Meso-KO) AsPC-1 tumor cells are included as a negative control. Shown is one of two independent experiments per tumor cell line. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, vs DMSO-treated condition. F) Quantification (mean ± SEM) of soluble mesothelin by ELISA in the culture supernatant of the indicated pancreatic tumor cell lines treated for 72 hours with increasing concentrations of aderbasib. Meso-KO AsPC-1 cells are included as a negative control. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, vs DMSO-treated condition. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

    Journal: Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

    Article Title: Ibrutinib and PD-1 blockade potentiate mesothelin-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer

    doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-2907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Representative histograms of ADAM-10 and ADAM-17 expression in the indicated pancreatic cancer cell lines as measured by flow cytometry. B) Representative flow histograms of mesothelin expression in the indicated pancreatic cancer cell lines. C-E) Representative flow histograms (C) and quantification (C-E; mean ± SEM; frequency and mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) of mesothelin expression in AsPC-1, CAPAN-2 and BxPC-3 tumor cells either left untreated (DMSO) or treated with the indicated concentrations of aderbasib for 72 hours. Mesothelin knock-out (Meso-KO) AsPC-1 tumor cells are included as a negative control. Shown is one of two independent experiments per tumor cell line. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, vs DMSO-treated condition. F) Quantification (mean ± SEM) of soluble mesothelin by ELISA in the culture supernatant of the indicated pancreatic tumor cell lines treated for 72 hours with increasing concentrations of aderbasib. Meso-KO AsPC-1 cells are included as a negative control. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, vs DMSO-treated condition. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: To analyze soluble mesothelin in the culture supernatant, the Human Mesothelin DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY3265) kit was used according to manufacturer protocol.

    Techniques: Expressing, In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Knock-Out, Negative Control, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    A) Fold change over timepoint 0 of the green area (mean ± SEM) of GFP-positive pancreatic tumor cells cultured alone or together with untransduced T cells (UTD) or meso-CAR-T cells in the absence (DMSO) or presence of 5uM aderbasib. Healthy donor (HD) 105 was used to manufacture meso-CAR-T cells. Two-way ANOVA is calculated between the meso-CAR + DMSO and the meso-CAR + aderbasib groups and between the UTD + DMSO and UTD + aderbasib groups. B) Schematic of the experimental design. AsPC-1-tumor bearing mice received aderbasib treatment by oral gavage (60mg/kg) starting 3 days prior and up to 14 days post adoptive transfer of 3e6 meso-CAR-T cells. C) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with UTD T cells or 3e6 meso-CAR-T cells either as monotherapy or in combination with aderbasib (treatment window is indicated by the lilac square. n=6 mice per group). HD53 was used to manufacture meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 66%, viability at infusion: >80%). Two-way ANOVA. D) Absolute numbers (mean ± SEM) of meso-CAR-T cells in the blood of AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated as indicated and as shown in B. E) Schematic of the experimental design. AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice received aderbasib treatment by oral gavage (60mg/kg) starting 4 days post CAR-T cell transfer (1.5e6 cells) and up to day 25. F) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with UTD T cells or 1.5e6 meso-CAR-T cells either as monotherapy or in combination with aderbasib (treatment window is indicated by the lilac square; n=4–6 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD207 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 68%, viability at infusion: >80%). G) Representative flow histograms and quantification (frequency and MFI, mean ± SEM) of mesothelin expression in AsPC-1 (GFP+) tumors harvested at day 28 from mice treated with UTD T cells alone or in combination with aderbasib from F. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.

    Journal: Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

    Article Title: Ibrutinib and PD-1 blockade potentiate mesothelin-targeting CAR-T cell therapy in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer

    doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-2907

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Fold change over timepoint 0 of the green area (mean ± SEM) of GFP-positive pancreatic tumor cells cultured alone or together with untransduced T cells (UTD) or meso-CAR-T cells in the absence (DMSO) or presence of 5uM aderbasib. Healthy donor (HD) 105 was used to manufacture meso-CAR-T cells. Two-way ANOVA is calculated between the meso-CAR + DMSO and the meso-CAR + aderbasib groups and between the UTD + DMSO and UTD + aderbasib groups. B) Schematic of the experimental design. AsPC-1-tumor bearing mice received aderbasib treatment by oral gavage (60mg/kg) starting 3 days prior and up to 14 days post adoptive transfer of 3e6 meso-CAR-T cells. C) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with UTD T cells or 3e6 meso-CAR-T cells either as monotherapy or in combination with aderbasib (treatment window is indicated by the lilac square. n=6 mice per group). HD53 was used to manufacture meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 66%, viability at infusion: >80%). Two-way ANOVA. D) Absolute numbers (mean ± SEM) of meso-CAR-T cells in the blood of AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated as indicated and as shown in B. E) Schematic of the experimental design. AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice received aderbasib treatment by oral gavage (60mg/kg) starting 4 days post CAR-T cell transfer (1.5e6 cells) and up to day 25. F) Tumor growth kinetic (tumor volume, mean ± SEM) in AsPC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with UTD T cells or 1.5e6 meso-CAR-T cells either as monotherapy or in combination with aderbasib (treatment window is indicated by the lilac square; n=4–6 mice per group). Two-way ANOVA. HD207 was used to generate meso-CAR-T cells (transduction: 68%, viability at infusion: >80%). G) Representative flow histograms and quantification (frequency and MFI, mean ± SEM) of mesothelin expression in AsPC-1 (GFP+) tumors harvested at day 28 from mice treated with UTD T cells alone or in combination with aderbasib from F. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: To analyze soluble mesothelin in the culture supernatant, the Human Mesothelin DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY3265) kit was used according to manufacturer protocol.

    Techniques: In Vitro, In Vivo, Cell Culture, Adoptive Transfer Assay, Transduction, Expressing